UNESCO and Inclusive Education: Historical Foundations of Global Policy and Contemporary Innovative Models

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19910839

Keywords:

generative artificial intelligence, inclusive education, constructivism, pseudo-inclusion, whole education approach

Abstract

Background and purpose. In the contemporary global education landscape, a gap between the declarative policy of inclusion and its actual school-level implementation has led to the growing phenomenon of “pseudo-inclusion.” Simply placing students in mainstream classrooms does not ensure their full participation in cognitive and social learning processes. In this context, the purpose of this study is to theoretically justify the effectiveness of integrating the Whole Education Approach (WEA) and generative artificial intelligence as a means of addressing this gap and implementing a constructivist paradigm in inclusive education. Materials and methods. The study was conducted using a qualitative systematic literature review design. Following PRISMA guidelines, 16 high-impact scientific publications from 2016–2026 were selected from Scopus, Web of Science databases, and UNESCO official reports. The analysis employed thematic content analysis, historical-comparative analysis, and synthesis methods. Results. The findings indicate that generative artificial intelligence has transformative potential in implementing the principles of Universal Design for Learning by automatically adapting learning content and optimizing cognitive load. It supports meaningful knowledge construction by scaffolding learners within their Zone of Proximal Development and enhances accessibility through multimodal support, reducing linguistic and sensory barriers. However, these technologies produce systematic educational outcomes only when integrated within the Whole Education Approach (WEA) ecosystem. In addition, algorithmic bias and risks of digital inequality were identified, emphasizing the need for strict ethical governance and digital safeguarding mechanisms. Conclusion. An effective model of inclusive education in the 21st century requires an organic synergy between macro-level governance structures  and micro-level technological personalization . The proposed integrated framework reduces pseudo-inclusion and contributes to the development of a more equitable and adaptive educational environment.

Author Biography

  • T. N. Mukhazhanova

    Мухажанова Толкын Нұрасылқызы — кандидат исторических наук, доцент кафедры всемирной истории

References

1. Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587

2. Antoninis, M., April, D., Barakat, B., Bella, N., D’Addio, A. C., Eck, M., Endrizzi, F., Joshi, P., Kubacka, K., McWilliam, A., Murakami, Y., Smith, W., Stipanovic, L., Vidarte, R., & Zekrya, L. (2020). All means all: An introduction to the 2020 Global Education Monitoring Report on inclusion. Prospects, 49(3), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09505-x

3. Bajaj, S., & Amin, P. (2026). Transforming the educational landscape: A critical analysis of inclusive pedagogy within the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020. International Journal of Contemporary Research in Multidisciplinary, 5(1), 609–613. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18631448

4. Chiu, T. K. F. (2023). The impact of Generative AI (GenAI) on practices, policies and research direction in education: A case of ChatGPT and Midjourney. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861

5. Dreyer, L. M. (2017). Inclusive education. In L. Ramrathan, L. Le Grange, & L. B. Shawa (Eds.), Education studies for initial teacher development (pp. 383–400). Juta.

6. Haug, P. (2017). Understanding inclusive education: Ideals and reality. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(2), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1158142

7. Hehir, T., Grindal, T., Freeman, B., Lamoreau, R., Borquaye, Y., & Burke, S. (2016). A summary of the evidence on inclusive education. Abt Associates. https://alana.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/A_Summary_of_the_evidence_on_inclusive_education.pdf

8. Jardinez, M. J., & Natividad, L. R. (2024). The advantages and challenges of inclusive education: Striving for equity in the classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 12(3), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13682977

9. Jemeli, C. M., & Fakandu, A. M. (2019). Equitable access to education and development in a knowledgeable society as advocated by UNESCO. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(6), 200–205. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2018.3647

10. Kenny, N., McCoy, S., & O’Higgins Norman, J. (2023). A whole education approach to inclusive education: An integrated model to guide planning, policy, and provision. Education Sciences, 13(9), 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090959

11. Luckin, R., & Holmes, W. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/corporate/global/pearson-dot-com/files/innovation/Intelligence-Unleashed-Publication.pdf

12. Singh, A., & Gupta, P. (2025). Perspective of generative AI for UNESCO inclusive education. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5181859

13. UNESCO. (2021). Global education monitoring report 2021/2: South East Asia - Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375790

14. Yati, Jaya, F., Kadarisman, Siswanto, R., & Sucipto. (2026). Technology-enhanced inclusive education and digital child protection for violence prevention in schools. Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v7i1.1998

15. Ydo, Y. (2020). Inclusive education: Global priority, collective responsibility. Prospects, 49(3), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09520-y

16. Zhang, J., Capellini, V., Rocha, E. P. d., Lamônica, D. A. C., & Muñoz-Martinez, Y. (2025). Editorial: Cross-sectoral collaboration in inclusive education. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1697199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1697199

Downloads

Published

30.04.2026

How to Cite

Tursynbek, T. A., & Mukhazhanova, T. N. (2026). UNESCO and Inclusive Education: Historical Foundations of Global Policy and Contemporary Innovative Models. SANA LOGOS – Republican Scientific Journal, 1(2), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19910839